Posts Tagged ‘Banking Compliance’

New Red Flags Compliance Date For Some

Friday, August 7th, 2009

The FTC recently announced another postmonement of the Red Flags enforcement. The new date is November 1, 2009, exactaly one year and 3 delayed dates later than the original enforcement date. The FTC says that the reason for the postmonement is for additional awareness especially for small organizations that do not know or understand their new requirements.

Red Flags is relatively new legislation designed to prevent identity theft by having companies implement formal, written programs to identify the warning signs, or “Red Flags” of identity theft. Many organizations are pushing back on the FTC saying they should not be required to comply. To date, I have heard of no group or company being given an exception. The American Bar Association (ABA) has recently filed a protest to the FTC on behalf of lawyers stating that they should not have to comply. The regulation states that all “Creditors” which are essentially any company who defers payment must comply. Obviously that is most companies, large and small.

Financial institutions are also required to comply, but their date did not change from the original November 1, 2008 date. According to Gartner, most of these organizations were already close or had policies in place anyway. So this is of greater impact to non-financial institutions right now.

If you’d like to learn more, click here to view a webinar I hosted in May about ensuring Red Flags compliance.


VISA removes Heartland and RBS Worldpay from compliant vendor list

Monday, March 16th, 2009

VISA has removed Heartland and RBS Worldpay from their list of PCI DSS compliant vendors.  This effectively puts these processors on probation while they recertify their PCI DSS compliance using a QSA (Qualified Security Assessor).  They are still able to process VISA transactions during this time.  See Article

Credit card issuers will also be able to get at least partial reimbursement for reissuing credit cards and fees associated with customer fraud and losses.  This is good news because over 600 banks have already reported losses associateed with the Heartland breach.

This is one of the first signs of real “teeth” in the PCI DSS.  Card brands are taking these breaches seriously and placing the blame and responsibility at the feet of those at fault.  I think this is a good move for VISA.  Until now, PCI was beginning to look like a way to hide from responsibility and fend off lawsuits.  With this move, it just may move in the direction of compelling merchants and processors to take data security seriously for the purpose of eliminating consumer fraud.  Lets hope anyway.